Regulating pests—material politics and calculation in integrated pest management

• Published in: Environment and planning. E, Nature and space (Print) Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. 455 - 472
• Main Author: Wolff, Leon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.03.2023
• Subjects: calculation; Biopolitics; pest management; environmental security; anthropocene; food security
• ISSN: 2514-8486; 2514-8494
• DOI: 10.1177/25148486221076138

This paper attempts to shed some light on current biopolitics of food and environmental security by analyzing the strategy of Integrated pest management (IPM). IPM is an ecological form of pest management that emerged in the United States in the 1950s in response to the pesticide crisis and now informs numerous pesticide legislations around the world. The paper analyzes IPM as a governmental hinge that aims to reconcile the conflicting goals of food security and environmental security. To this end, the paper makes three intertwined arguments. First, through an examination of scientific texts from the field of economic entomology, the paper shows how biological and chemical pest control methods are produced as two conflicting materialities that must be mediated. In a second step, the text shows how economically defined thresholds and cost-benefit analyzes are used to level the difference between these two materialities and make them commensurable. Finally, it elaborates how IPM aims primarily at transforming farmers’ practices. The use of chemicals in agriculture is to be reduced by transforming farmers into calculating subjects. Overall, the article aims to show how IPM, as an important element of contemporary ecological governmentality, seeks to realize positive environmental effects in the quantitative medium of economics and science.