Evidence surveillance for a living clinical guideline: Case study of the Australian stroke guidelines

• Published in: Health information and libraries journal
• Main Authors: McDonald, Steve, Hill, Kelvin, Li, Heidi Z., Turner, Tari
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 09.11.2023
• ISSN: 1471-1834; 1471-1842
• DOI: 10.1111/hir.12515

Abstract Background Continual evidence surveillance is an integral feature of living guidelines. The Australian Stroke Guidelines include recommendations on 100 clinical topics and have been ‘living’ since 2018. Objectives To describe the approach for establishing and evaluating an evidence surveillance system for the living Australian Stroke Guidelines. Methods We developed a pragmatic surveillance system based on an analysis of the searches for the 2017 Stroke Guidelines and evaluated its reliability by assessing the potential impact on guideline recommendations. Search retrieval and screening workload are monitored monthly, together with the frequency of changes to the guideline recommendations. Results Evidence surveillance was guided by practical considerations of efficiency and sustainability. A single PubMed search covering all guideline topics, limited to systematic reviews and randomised trials, is run monthly. The search retrieves about 400 records a month of which a sixth are triaged to the guideline panels for further consideration. Evaluations with Epistemonikos and the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register demonstrated the robustness of adopting this more restrictive approach. Collaborating with the guideline team in designing, implementing and evaluating the surveillance is essential for optimising the approach. Conclusion Monthly evidence surveillance for a large living guideline is feasible and sustainable when applying a pragmatic approach.