Assessment of arterial supply to the stomach after bariatric surgery using multidetector CT arteriography

• Published in: Abdominal imaging Vol. 49; no. 12; pp. 4198 - 4208
• Main Authors: Khalil, Adham, Gomez, Erin, Gowda, Prateek C., Weinstein, Robert M., Eberly, Hänel Watkins, Prologo, Frank J., Birkholz, James H., Sarwani, Nabeel E., Friedberg, Eric, Rogers, Ann M., Weiss, Clifford R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Angiography; Arteriography; Complications; Computed tomography; Gastrectomy; Gastric bypass; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal surgery; Hepatology; Hollow Organ GI; Imaging; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Patients; Postoperative; Radiology; Stomach; Surgery; Surgical equipment; Veins & arteries; Computed tomography; Bariatric surgery; Vascular patency
• ISSN: 2366-0058; 2366-004X; 2366-0058
• DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04467-6

Purpose To describe residual arterial supply to the stomach after bariatric surgery via a systematic arterial-phase CT assessment approach that can aid in diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications and facilitate planning for future procedures. Methods Arterial-phase CT of 46 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) at 3 academic institutions were retrospectively reviewed to assess patency of left gastric artery (LGA), right gastric artery (RGA), gastroepiploic artery (GEA), and left inferior phrenic artery (LIPA) and presence of gastric perforators. Results In 25 RYGB and 21 SG patients, mean diameters were LGA 2.2 ± 0.4 mm, RGA 1.6 ± 0.5 mm, and GEA 1.7 ± 0.4 mm. On RYGB scans, all LGAs, RGAs, and 24/25 (96%) of GEAs were identified. Excellent to good patency was seen in 20/25 (80%) LGAs, 21/25 (84%) RGAs, and 23/24 (96%) GEAs. On SG scans, all LGAs, 18/21 (86%) of RGAs, and 20/21 (95%) GEAs were identified. Excellent to good patency was seen in 17/21 (81%) LGAs, 15/18 (83%) RGAs, and 20/20 (100%) GEAs. In terms of gastric perforators, LGA supply was seen on 23/25 (92%) of RYGB and 17/17 (100%) of SG scans. RGA supply was seen on 13/21 (62%) RYGB and 9/18 (50%) SG scans. GEA supply was seen on 19/23 (83%) RYGB scans. No gastric supply via GEA was seen on SG scans. Conclusion In this study, arterial supply to the stomach through the LGA was consistently identified in all RYGB and SG cases, indicating an uncomplicated surgical approach with regard to preserving the LGA. Dedicated CT angiography protocol or catheter-directed angiography is recommended for accurate and comprehensive assessment of the gastric blood supply, particularly before surgical re-intervention.