Barriers and facilitators to providing autonomy supportive counselling to individuals seeking treatment for an eating disorder

• Published in: Eating and weight disorders Vol. 27; no. 7; pp. 2919 - 2929
• Main Authors: Oliverio, Stephanie, Steiger, Howard, St-Hilaire, Annie, Paquin-Hodge, Chloé, Leloup, Anne-Gaëlle, Israel, Mimi, Thaler, Lea
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.10.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Anorexia; Brief Report; Bulimia; Counseling; Eating disorders; Internships; Interviews; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Motivation; Obesity; Patients; Psychiatry; Psychotherapy; Therapists; Facilitators; Psychotherapy; Autonomous motivation; Barriers; Eating disorders; Autonomy support
• ISSN: 1590-1262; 1124-4909; 1590-1262
• DOI: 10.1007/s40519-022-01395-6

Purpose Self-determination theory suggests that autonomous motivation for change (i.e., motivation that is internal and self-endorsed) can be enhanced in therapeutic contexts by clinicians acting in an autonomy supportive manner. While previous research has established a link between autonomy support (AS) and autonomous motivation in enhancing outcomes in eating disorder (ED) treatment, few studies have examined factors that support or hinder therapists’ ability to be autonomy supportive in the context of an ED therapeutic encounter. The goal of the present study was to conduct a qualitative analysis of personal and contextual factors that facilitated or hindered therapists’ ability to provide autonomy supportive interventions. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 therapists conducting outpatient psychotherapy at a specialized eating disorders treatment program. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results The most frequently noted facilitators were organizational support of AS interventions and patients’ engagement and motivation for treatment. The most frequently noted barriers were patients’ personality variables such as patients that exhibit passive and help-rejecting behaviours, as well as therapists feeling overwhelmed due to a high workload. Conclusion Our results provide insight into the factors that facilitate and impede the utilization of an autonomy supportive approach in specialized ED treatment and can be used to inform future quantitative research on such factors. Level of evidence Level V: Opinions of respected authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.