Pitfalls of social media for aesthetic eye surgery patients: assessing YouTube’s aesthetic canthoplasty content

• Published in: International ophthalmology Vol. 44; no. 1; p. 279
• Main Authors: Yılmaz, İbrahim Edhem, Mercanlı, Murat, Doğan, Levent
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 25.06.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Audiovisual materials; Blepharoplasty - methods; Esthetics; Eyelid; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; Ophthalmology; Original Paper; Patients; Psychological factors; Reliability; Reproducibility of Results; Sensory integration; Social Media; Social networks; Surgery; Video; Patient education; Aesthetic eye surgery; Fox-eye surgery; Global quality score; Social media influence; Canthoplasty; YouTube
• ISSN: 1573-2630; 0165-5701; 1573-2630
• DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03197-4

Purpose YouTube, a popular source for diverse information, hosts a wealth of content on aesthetic canthoplasty. Yet, concerns linger about the accuracy and reliability of these videos, with potential for inaccuracies, biases, or misleading information. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube content on this sought-after facial enhancement procedure. Methods The study employs four distinct scoring tools: the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET), the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), and the Video Power Index (VPI). Results Analysis of a total of 173 YouTube videos relevant to aesthetic canthoplasty revealed scores that were primarily indicative of poor quality and reliability.(Mean score ± SD, PEMAT A/V: 30.75 ± 28.8, MQ-VET: 28.57 ± 12.6, GQS: 1.7 ± 1) Notably, these videos were predominantly uploaded by healthcare professionals (82.1%), and they focused more on advertisements (46.2%) than on scientific or educational information. Their elevated viewership and engagement metrics (likes, comments, and shares) attest to their significant popularity and influence. (Mean VPI score: 176.6 ± 635.8). Conclusion YouTube’s influence on aesthetic eyelid surgery is undeniable, shaping patient choices and expectations. However, unrealistic beauty ideals, heightened body dissatisfaction, and social comparisons lurk within its content, potentially harming psychological well-being and surgical decisions. Prioritizing qualified medical guidance and critical evaluation of online information are crucial for patients. Authors and platforms must act responsibly: authors by producing high-quality content, platforms by tackling misinformation.