Sediment production process and hydraulic characteristics of ephemeral gully erosion in granite hilly area

•SY and Sr of the SL was the largest, but the sediment MWD was the smallest.•Change in the flow discharge did not affect the distribution pattern of sediment particles.•Dynamic coupling of runoff hydraulics and EG morphology drove soil loss.•SDR was the most direct influencing factor on the Sr in EG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCatena (Giessen) Vol. 239; p. 107946
Main Authors Lin, Zhe, Huang, Wanxia, Liao, Dalan, Deng, Yusong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 30.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•SY and Sr of the SL was the largest, but the sediment MWD was the smallest.•Change in the flow discharge did not affect the distribution pattern of sediment particles.•Dynamic coupling of runoff hydraulics and EG morphology drove soil loss.•SDR was the most direct influencing factor on the Sr in EGs. Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion represents the early stage of large-scale gully (locally named as “Benggang”) development on Ultisols in the granite hilly area. However, the EG erosion process and the mechanism underlying sediment production have not been fully elucidated. In this study, a series of field scouring experiments were conducted under different flow discharge levels (10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 L·min−1), and the primary EGs in three typical soil layers with different weathering degrees (red soil layer (RL), transition layer (TL), and sandy layer (SL)) was dynamically monitored. The results indicated that the ratio of width to depth of the EGs rapidly decreased as the flow discharge increased. At 30 L·min−1, the average sediment yield and transport rate (Sr) of the SL were 4.85 and 5.39 times, greater than those of the RL, respectively. The sediment particles were concentrated within the 1–2 mm particle size range, accounting for over 35 %. In addition, the mean weight diameter of the sediment particles in the RL was the largest. The sediment distribution characteristics did not respond to flow changes but were affected by EG morphological changes. With increasing flow discharge, the flow shear stress and stream power increased. Further analysis revealed that the coupling effect of flow hydraulic characteristics and EG morphological evolution drove the EG erosion sediment production process, and the Sr of the SL was highly sensitive to flow discharge changes. The soil disintegration rate was an internal factor that directly affected soil loss in the EGs, with a path coefficient of 0.71. The bulk density, organic matter content, and sand content were all indirect influencing factors. The RL exhibited greater anti-erodibility than the other layers and could serve as an effective protective layerfor granite hilly areas. These findings provide a theoretical basis for improving soil loss management systems.
ISSN:0341-8162
1872-6887
DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2024.107946