Engaging over data on fracking and water quality

• Published in: Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) Vol. 359; no. 6374; pp. 395 - 397
• Main Authors: Brantley, S L, Vidic, R D, Brasier, K, Yoxtheimer, D, Pollak, J, Wilderman, C, Wen, T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The American Association for the Advancement of Science 26.01.2018
• Subjects: Citizen Participation; Decision making; Humans; Hydraulic Fracking; Hydraulic fracturing; Indigenous Knowledge; Jurisdiction; Methane - analysis; Natural gas; Public participation; Regulators; Trust (Psychology); Water; Water - chemistry; Water Quality
• ISSN: 0036-8075; 1095-9203
• DOI: 10.1126/science.aan6520

Data alone aren't the solution, but they bring people together Extraction of unconventional oil and gas using high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF)—“fracking”—is a “wicked” problem: Science and policymaking are complex and opaque; problems are unstructured, cross areas of policy jurisdiction, require coordinated action among various stakeholders who disagree about values, and tend to result in limited solutions with complex consequences ( 1 ). Public participation in decision-making about hydrocarbon extraction is limited by the largely private nature of transactions among mineral rights owners and industry and the narrow opportunity for public input into procedures. Likewise, obstacles to accessing water-quality data and the dearth and diversity of such data limit shared understanding. We found, however, that, although data alone do not resolve wicked problems, shared interest in gathering, discussing, and improving water-quality data can lead to productive discussions among scientists, citizens with local knowledge, regulators, and industry practitioners. Such opportunities to “pull back the curtain” on science, funded and facilitated by honest brokers, could build trust and develop procedural fairness as foundations for social license.