Psychometric properties and cross‐cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index: A community‐based study of adolescent irritability

Self-reported scales that adequately measure tonic irritability and provide international comparability are lacking in Japan. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of both self- and parent-reported versions of the Japanese version of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPCN reports Vol. 4; no. 3; p. e70169
Main Authors Osada, Makoto, Mori, Hiroyuki, Takahashi, Michio, Shinkawa, Hiroki, Adachi, Masaki, Adachi, Minami, Saito, Takuya, Nakamura, Kazuhiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.09.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Self-reported scales that adequately measure tonic irritability and provide international comparability are lacking in Japan. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of both self- and parent-reported versions of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index. We used 2019 data from the Hirosaki City School Cohort Study, which is a part of the Assessment of Preschool to Adolescence-Longitudinal Epidemiological Study. To evaluate the construct validity of the Affective Reactivity Index, we examined the association between depressive symptoms and emotional and conduct problems. We applied item response theory to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Affective Reactivity Index and assess various latent traits. Our findings confirmed the reliability and construct validity of both the self- and parent-reported versions of the Affective Reactivity Index (  = 0.86 and 0.82, respectively). The item response theory analysis confirmed the psychometric properties of these measures in a Japanese context. This study comprehensively examined the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index for both self- and parent-reports. These findings mark a crucial step in developing culturally adapted tools for assessing irritability in Japanese adolescents, contributing to both research and clinical settings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Makoto Osada and Hiroyuki Mori equally contributed to the manuscript and are considered co‐first authors.
ISSN:2769-2558
2769-2558
DOI:10.1002/pcn5.70169