Guidelines for Microplate Selection in High Content Imaging

• Published in: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) Vol. 1683; p. 75
• Main Author: Trask, Oscar J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 2018
• Subjects: High-Throughput Screening Assays; Microscopy; Molecular Imaging - methods; Molecular Imaging - standards; Optical Imaging; Multiwell; Slides; Flat; Bottom; Microplates; Microtiter; Autofocus; Plates; Surface
• ISSN: 1940-6029
• DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7357-6_6

Since the inception of commercialized automated high content screening (HCS) imaging devices in the mid to late 1990s, the adoption of media vessels typically used to house and contain biological specimens for interrogation has transitioned from microscope slides and petri dishes into multi-well microtiter plates called microplates. The early 96- and 384-well microplates commonly used in other high-throughput screening (HTS) technology applications were often not designed for optical imaging. Since then, modifications and the use of next-generation materials with improved optical clarity have enhanced the quality of captured images, reduced autofocusing failures, and empowered the use of higher power magnification objectives to resolve fine detailed measurements at the subcellular pixel level. The plethora of microplates and their applications requires practitioners of high content imaging (HCI) to be especially diligent in the selection and adoption of the best plates for running longitudinal studies or larger screening campaigns. While the highest priority in experimental design is the selection of the biological model, the choice of microplate can alter the biological response and ultimately may change the experimental outcome. This chapter will provide readers with background, troubleshooting guidelines, and considerations for choosing an appropriate microplate.