Screening for grain dormancy in segregating generations of dormant × non-dormant crosses in white-grained wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a significant problem. Introgression of genes controlling grain dormancy into white-grained bread wheat is one means of improving resistance to PHS. In this study seven dormant (containing the SW95-50213 and AUS1408 sources) × non-dorman...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuphytica Vol. 172; no. 2; pp. 183 - 195
Main Authors Hickey, Lee T, Dieters, Mark J, DeLacy, Ian H, Christopher, Mandy J, Kravchuk, Olena Y, Banks, Phillip M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands 01.03.2010
Springer Netherlands
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a significant problem. Introgression of genes controlling grain dormancy into white-grained bread wheat is one means of improving resistance to PHS. In this study seven dormant (containing the SW95-50213 and AUS1408 sources) × non-dormant crosses were produced to investigate the effectiveness of selection for grain dormancy in early segregating generations. Each generation (F₁-F₄) was grown in a temperature controlled glasshouse with an extended photoperiod (i.e. continuous light). F₂ and F₃ generations were subject to selection. Five hundred harvest-ripe grains were tested for germination over a 14 day period, and the 100 most dormant grains were retained and grown-on to produce the next generation within each cross. The response to selection was assessed through analysis of the time to 50% germination (G₅₀) in the F₂, F₃ and F₄ generations. In addition, changes in marker class frequencies for two SSR markers (barc170 and gpw2279) flanking a known quantitative trait locus (QTL) for grain dormancy on chromosome 4A were assessed in DNA from F₂ plants selected from early germinating (non-dormant) and late germinating (dormant) phenotypic extremes within each cross. Selection for grain dormancy in the F₂ and F₃ generations effectively recovered the dormant phenotype in all seven crosses, i.e. the F₄ generation was not significantly different from the dormant parent. Further, selection based on individual F₂ grains changed marker class frequencies for the 4A dormancy QTL; in most cases eliminating the marker class homozygous for the non-dormant alleles. Application of this screening method will enable breeders to better select for grain dormancy and may lead to development of new cultivars offering effective resistance to PHS in the near future.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0028-z
ISSN:0014-2336
1573-5060
DOI:10.1007/s10681-009-0028-z