Ballast water management: technology choice comparing TODIM and THOR 2

• Published in: Independent Journal of Management & Production Vol. 12; no. 8; pp. 2140 - 2160
• Main Authors: Simões Gomes, Carlos Francisco, Autran Monteiro Gomes, Luiz Flavio, Duncan Rangel, Luís Alberto, Tenório, Fabrício Maione, Santos, Marcos dos
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sao Paulo Independent Journal of Management & Production, I J M & P 01.11.2021
• Subjects: Case studies; Decision making; Environmental impact; Marine pollution; Maritime transportation; Methods; Multicriteria Decision Aid; Native species; Oceans; Shellfish; THOR 2; TODIM; Water pollution; Water treatment; United States > US; Black Sea
• ISSN: 2236-269X; 2236-269X
• DOI: 10.14807/ijmp.v12i8.1487

This paper approaches the problem of ballast water treatment in ships. This has been identified as one of the four greatest threats to the world’s oceans. Solutions that have been considered for solving the problem are alternative water treatment technologies. In the case study reported in this paper three major water treatment technologies have been evaluated with the help of twenty-six criteria, quantitative as well as qualitative by using two discrete multicriteria methods, TODIM and THOR 2. The THOR 2 consists of the axiomatic evolution of the THOR method and both THOR 2 and THOR are made available through the THOR Web platform. Five groups of evaluation criteria are then considered: practicality; biological effectiveness; cost/benefit ratio; time frame for the implementation of standards; and environmental impact of the process' sub-products. In this paper a case study on choosing a ballast water treatment technology is presented. Three alternative ballast water management technologies are proposed by experts in the field and are evaluated with the help of twenty-six criteria, quantitative as well as qualitative. Each ballast water management method is described by a list of twenty-six attributes or criteria. After setting the problem in a clear way and consulting different experts, the two separate applications of both TODIM and THOR 2 are performed. What is denoted as Management Method #1 is indeed chosen as the best alternative according to both methods. The conclusion is that those two methods, although conceptually and analytically quite different, lead essentially to the same main results.  Two other applications of both TODIM and THOR have indeed confirmed the convergence of results in spite of the conceptual and technical differences between the two methods. This suggests that formulating a decision problem in a correct, clear-cut way can be at least as important as the technical characteristics of the method per se.