Regulatory Consistency and Common Sense: FTC Policy toward Food Advertising under Revised Labeling Regulations
A driving force in the jurisdictional debate was the fundamental difference in regulatory approaches taken by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC has long pursued a market oriented consumer protection policy; the FDA, on the other hand, has pursue...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of public policy & marketing Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 154 - 163 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ann Arbor
American Marketing Association
01.04.1995
The Division SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A driving force in the jurisdictional debate was the fundamental difference in regulatory approaches taken by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC has long pursued a market oriented consumer protection policy; the FDA, on the other hand, has pursued a nutrition regulation strategy. The revisions to food labels resulting from implementation of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act have changed the options available to the FTC. In May 1994, the FTC issued an Enforcement Policy Statement on Food Advertising, clarifying its views on how labeling and advertising standards should be reconciled. Generally, the Policy Statement asserts that claims complying with FDA labeling rules are also acceptable advertising rules. The FTC Policy Statement strives mightily to reconcile the divergent regulatory approaches to labeling and advertising where necessary, preserve advertising's ability to inform consumers of legitimate and potentially important product differences where possible, and inform marketers of the standards it will apply. Those objectives are not completely consistent, and none is completely met. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0743-9156 1547-7207 |
DOI: | 10.1177/074391569501400115 |