Intertidal Soundscapes of Hardened and Living Shorelines: A Case Study of Habitat Enhancement

• Published in: Aquatic conservation Vol. 34; no. 3
• Main Authors: Looby, Audrey, Reynolds, Laura K., McDonald, Ashley M., Barry, Savanna C., Clark, Mark, Martin, Charles W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Acoustic attenuation; Acoustic tracking; Acoustics; Anthropogenic factors; anthropogenic noise; Attenuation; bioacoustics; Biological settlement; Case studies; Coastal management; Coastal zone management; Construction; Control theory; ecoacoustics; Ecological function; Environmental degradation; Environmental monitoring; Feedback loops; Fish; fishes; habitat restoration; Habitats; High frequency; Human influences; Invertebrates; Larval stage; Low frequencies; Macroinvertebrates; Nekton; oysters; riprap; salt marshes; Shoreline protection; Shorelines; Sound pressure; Soundscapes; Time of use; Underwater; Zoobenthos
• ISSN: 1052-7613; 1099-0755
• DOI: 10.1002/aqc.4118

Organisms, such as fishes and invertebrates and including their larval stages, listen to underwater soundscapes to detect information about nearby habitats. Such soundscapes may be influenced by habitat degradation or enhancement, which can lead to acoustically mediated feedback loops affecting the overall ecosystem. Despite the importance of underwater sounds on ecological functioning, there have been limited studies documenting soundscapes of intertidal ecosystems and few, if any, of living shoreline soundscapes. Living shorelines would especially benefit from acoustically mediated effects for objectives like encouraging fish and invertebrate settlement. This case study used a Before‐After‐Control‐Impact design to sample soundscapes and nekton (i.e., fishes and mobile macroinvertebrates) at a living shoreline construction and a nearby hardened shoreline in Cedar Key, FL (USA). Diel soundscape patterns and acoustic attenuation at the two sites were also described a year following the living shoreline construction. In the acoustic sampling, the high frequency bands of both shorelines were dominated by invertebrate sounds that were influenced by season, site and time of day, while the low frequency band of the living shoreline was often dominated by a loud anthropogenic sound. About a year after the living shoreline installation—despite similar measured acoustic attenuation at both sites—the living shoreline featured louder sound pressure levels compared to the hardened shoreline, which may be particularly beneficial for promoting foundational species and other organism settlement. These results demonstrate that Gulf of Mexico intertidal habitats may have soundscape differences even within close proximity and that living shorelines may enhance acoustic characteristics in ways beneficial to continued shoreline development. This represents an important step in better understanding the relationships between habitat structures, nekton communities, and their associated soundscapes as well as the application of passive acoustic monitoring to improve coastal management and conservation.