Cochlear Implantation Improves Both Speech Perception and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Follow-Up Study of Treatment Benefits among Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 11; no. 8; p. 2257
• Main Authors: Rasmussen, Kasper Møller Boje, West, Niels Cramer, Bille, Michael, Sandvej, Matilde Grønborg, Cayé-Thomasen, Per
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 18.04.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Audiology; Clinical medicine; Cochlear implants; Ears & hearing; Hearing loss; Noise; Otolaryngology; Patients; Perceptions; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Speech; Surgery; Transplants & implants; Voice recognition; treatment; cochlear implant; PROM; hearing loss; patient-reported outcome measures; outcome; hearing rehabilitation
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082257

Cochlear implantation is considered the best treatment option for patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss for whom conventional hearing aids are insufficient. We used a repeated measures longitudinal approach to evaluate speech recognition and patient-reported outcomes after cochlear implantation in an unbiased cohort of Danish adult patients in a prospective cohort study. We assessed 39 recipients before and two times after implantation using a battery of tests that included Dantale I, the Danish Hearing in Noise Test, the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. The study group improved significantly on all outcome measures following implantation. On average, Dantale I scores improved by 29 percentage points and Hearing in Noise Test scores improved by 22 percentage points. Most notably, the average Dantale score improved from 26 to 70% in the CI in quiet condition and from 12 to 42% in the cochlear implantation in noise condition when tested monaurally. Dantale demonstrated a significant positive correlation with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale scores, while Hearing in Noise Test had no significant correlation with the patient-reported outcome measures. Patients improved significantly at 4 months and marginally improved further at 14 months, indicating that they were approaching a plateau. Our study's use of audiometric and patient-reported outcome measures provides evidence of the treatment benefits of cochlear implantation in adults, which may help physicians advise patients on treatment decisions and align treatment benefit expectations, as well as serve as a foundation for the development of new cochlear implantation selection criteria.