Hybrid Strategy-Interference or Integration? How Corporate Communication Impacts Consumers' Memory and Company Evaluation
This study investigates whether hybrid strategy would be more effective than corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy in boosting CSR information recall and company evaluation. Informed by the corporate ability (CA)-CSR-hybrid communication strategy typology, the associative network theory, an...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of strategic communication Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 122 - 138 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia
Routledge
14.03.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study investigates whether hybrid strategy would be more effective than corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy in boosting CSR information recall and company evaluation. Informed by the corporate ability (CA)-CSR-hybrid communication strategy typology, the associative network theory, and memory interference and integration literature, this study conducted a 2 (prior corporate associations) × 2 (subsequent corporate communication strategies) between-subjects experiment. Findings showed that hybrid (vs. CSR) strategy was more effective in generating CSR information recall when a company had previously established CA associations but did not outperform CSR strategy when the company had no previous CA associations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1553-118X 1553-1198 |
DOI: | 10.1080/1553118X.2020.1730378 |