Hybrid Strategy-Interference or Integration? How Corporate Communication Impacts Consumers' Memory and Company Evaluation

This study investigates whether hybrid strategy would be more effective than corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy in boosting CSR information recall and company evaluation. Informed by the corporate ability (CA)-CSR-hybrid communication strategy typology, the associative network theory, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of strategic communication Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 122 - 138
Main Authors Chen, Zifei Fay, Tao, Weiting
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Routledge 14.03.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigates whether hybrid strategy would be more effective than corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy in boosting CSR information recall and company evaluation. Informed by the corporate ability (CA)-CSR-hybrid communication strategy typology, the associative network theory, and memory interference and integration literature, this study conducted a 2 (prior corporate associations) × 2 (subsequent corporate communication strategies) between-subjects experiment. Findings showed that hybrid (vs. CSR) strategy was more effective in generating CSR information recall when a company had previously established CA associations but did not outperform CSR strategy when the company had no previous CA associations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1553-118X
1553-1198
DOI:10.1080/1553118X.2020.1730378