Anticipated maximum scale precipitation for calculating the worst-case floods

Against increasing number of unprecedented heavy rains and typhoons reflecting climate change, the Japanese Government decided saving life as the top priority considering a ‘worst-case’ scenario. Accordingly, the Flood Risk Management Act was amended in 2015 to use the anticipated maximum scale prec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater policy Vol. 23; no. S1; pp. 128 - 143
Main Authors Takeuchi, Kuniyoshi, Tanaka, Shigenobu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IWA Publishing 01.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Against increasing number of unprecedented heavy rains and typhoons reflecting climate change, the Japanese Government decided saving life as the top priority considering a ‘worst-case’ scenario. Accordingly, the Flood Risk Management Act was amended in 2015 to use the anticipated maximum scale precipitation (AMSP) for flood inundation calculation. In order to estimate the AMSP, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) chose historical maximum areal precipitation in the form of duration–area–depth (DAD) curves rather than climate change projections' dataset d4PDF. In this paper, policy development and detailed estimation procedures for the AMSP were reviewed and discussed. It was concluded that the current climate change projections are still not accurate enough to be used as the basis for real local operations, while long accumulated ground observations and ground-based radars are available in good quality all over Japan. But at the same time, historical maximum should always be updated as past records are renewed. Also, regional partitioning should not be done at too coarse of scale for proper regionalization of DAD. Such strategy would serve as a useful reference for other nations.
ISSN:1366-7017
1996-9759
DOI:10.2166/wp.2021.241