Support Vector Regression for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling in Urban Drainage: A Comparison with the EPA’s Storm Water Management Model

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 8; no. 3; p. 69
• Main Authors: Granata, Francesco, Gargano, Rudy, Marinis, Giovanni de
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.03.2016
• Subjects: Case studies; Drainage; Freshwater; Hydrology; Neural networks; Precipitation; Rain; Runoff; Stormwater; Support vector machines; Italy; MED, Italy
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w8030069

Rainfall-runoff models can be classified into three types: physically based models, conceptual models, and empirical models. In this latter class of models, the catchment is considered as a black box, without any reference to the internal processes that control the transformation of rainfall to runoff. In recent years, some models derived from studies on artificial intelligence have found increasing use. Among these, particular attention should be paid to Support Vector Machines (SVMs). This paper shows a comparative study of rainfall-runoff modeling between a SVM-based approach and the EPA's Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). The SVM is applied in the variant called Support Vector regression (SVR). Two different experimental basins located in the north of Italy have been considered as case studies. Two criteria have been chosen to assess the consistency between the recorded and predicted flow rates: the root-mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination. The two models showed comparable performance. In particular, both models can properly model the hydrograph shape, the time to peak and the total runoff. The SVR algorithm tends to underestimate the peak discharge, while SWMM tends to overestimate it. SVR shows great potential for applications in the field of urban hydrology, but currently it also has significant limitations regarding the model calibration.