Measurement of Upper Extremity-Specific Comfort and Capability

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantify symptom intensity and magnitude of capability. Upper extremity PROMs were developed shortly after the advent of general health PROMs. PROMs are still primarily research tools, and their use with individual patients is still evolving. When PROMs were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Main Authors Ibezim, Chizitam F, Reichel, Lee M, Ring, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 15.10.2023
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantify symptom intensity and magnitude of capability. Upper extremity PROMs were developed shortly after the advent of general health PROMs. PROMs are still primarily research tools, and their use with individual patients is still evolving. When PROMs were developed, the initial and intuitive expectation was a strong correlation of comfort and capability with pathophysiology severity. In other words, people with greater radiographic arthritis or larger degenerative tendon defects were expected to feel worse and do less. After more than 20 years of research using PROMs, it is clear that mindset and circumstances account for more of the variation in PROMs than pathophysiology severity. Mounting research establishes upper extremity PROMs and PROMs in general as useful tools for anchoring and developing comprehensive, biopsychosocial approaches to care.
ISSN:1940-5480
DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00109