Public Perspectives on Consent for and Governance of Biobanking in Japan

Through strengthened biobank governance, broad consent has been widely accepted as a means to replace donors’ discretion based on the information of individual research protocols. Trust and other ethical and social notions, such as reciprocity and solidarity, are key concepts that support biobank go...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of empirical research on human research ethics Vol. 19; no. 4-5; pp. 208 - 219
Main Authors Oikawa, Masanori, Takimoto, Yoshiyuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2024
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Through strengthened biobank governance, broad consent has been widely accepted as a means to replace donors’ discretion based on the information of individual research protocols. Trust and other ethical and social notions, such as reciprocity and solidarity, are key concepts that support biobank governance. The types of allowed broad consent are several; however, they remain unclear, and whether these ethical and social notions are associated with public attitudes toward the consent model is not fully understood. This quantitative study examined two hypotheses: narrower and limited broad consent are more accepted by the public, and acceptance rates for broad consent increase with established measures related to biobank governance. This analysis supported both hypotheses, implying that the limited type of broad consent should be considered an important option, and that a specific type of governance is critical in promoting trust, reciprocity, and solidarity between biobanks and the public.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1556-2646
1556-2654
1556-2654
DOI:10.1177/15562646241286143