Effect of Two Kinds of Different Combined Oral Contraceptives Used on Bone Mineral Density in Women of Reproductive Age

Objective To compare bone mineral density (BMD) among users of ethinylestradiol/ desogestrel, ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate and nonhormonal control subjects. Methods The study included 154 women aged 25-40 years. Forty-six women were using ethinylestradiol/desogestrel (group A) and 55 women u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of reproduction and contraception Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 145 - 151
Main Authors LIU, Rui-jian, GAI, Ling, JIA, Yi-fang, GAI, Ping, YU, Xiao-jie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.09.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1001-7844
DOI10.1016/S1001-7844(12)60010-8

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To compare bone mineral density (BMD) among users of ethinylestradiol/ desogestrel, ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate and nonhormonal control subjects. Methods The study included 154 women aged 25-40 years. Forty-six women were using ethinylestradiol/desogestrel (group A) and 55 women using ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate (group B)for 24 months and 53 women using nonhormonal contraception as control subjects (group C). BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were obtained using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, comparing mean BMD changes in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) users with nonusers. Results For 24 months of treatment, lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD values in women who used ethinylestradiol/desogestrel and ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate were not significantly different compared with the baseline and the values of subjects in nonuser (P〉0.05). Conclusion There was no statistical difference in BMD between the users of ethinylestradiol/desogestrel or ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate and nonusers.
Bibliography:Objective To compare bone mineral density (BMD) among users of ethinylestradiol/ desogestrel, ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate and nonhormonal control subjects. Methods The study included 154 women aged 25-40 years. Forty-six women were using ethinylestradiol/desogestrel (group A) and 55 women using ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate (group B)for 24 months and 53 women using nonhormonal contraception as control subjects (group C). BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were obtained using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, comparing mean BMD changes in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) users with nonusers. Results For 24 months of treatment, lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD values in women who used ethinylestradiol/desogestrel and ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate were not significantly different compared with the baseline and the values of subjects in nonuser (P〉0.05). Conclusion There was no statistical difference in BMD between the users of ethinylestradiol/desogestrel or ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate and nonusers.
combined oral contraceptives (COC); ethinylestradiol/desogestrel; ethinylestradiol/ cyproterone acetate; bone mineral density (BMD)
31-1555/R
ISSN:1001-7844
DOI:10.1016/S1001-7844(12)60010-8