Modelling consideration heterogeneity in a two-stage conjunctive model

We propose a two-stage choice model in which decision makers first filter out alternatives (consideration stage) before choosing their preferred alternative among the considered options (choice stage). The model accounts for heterogeneity in consideration screening by allowing respondents to have di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of mathematical psychology Vol. 109; p. 102687
Main Authors Traets, Frits, Meulders, Michel, Vandebroek, Martina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We propose a two-stage choice model in which decision makers first filter out alternatives (consideration stage) before choosing their preferred alternative among the considered options (choice stage). The model accounts for heterogeneity in consideration screening by allowing respondents to have different thresholds for accepting attribute levels. By utilizing a conjunctive consideration rule, the model can capture well-known non-compensatory screening heuristics. The decision stage is modelled with a compensatory utility model. We compare our two-stage approach with the mixed logit model on simulated choice data, and conclude that both models can be distinguished based on the pattern of opt-out responses they produce. If such responses are the result of screening behaviour, the two-stage model is always selected in favour of a single-stage model. In addition, we evaluated several models on empirical choice data concerning preferences towards cinemas. Our results show that the data is best explained by the proposed model, suggesting that 73% of the participants used a screening rule before making a final choice. •Considering and choosing are treated as distinct mental processes.•A conjunctive heuristic was used to approximate a variety of screening behaviour.•The two-stage model better explained the choice data than a mixed logit model.•The case study suggests that 73% of the respondents used a screening rule.
ISSN:0022-2496
1096-0880
DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102687