Genetic algorithm for the reduction printing time and dimensional precision improvement on 3D components printed by Fused Filament Fabrication

• Published in: International journal of advanced manufacturing technology Vol. 115; no. 11-12; pp. 3965 - 3981
• Main Authors: Aguilar-Duque, Julián I., Balderrama-Armendáriz, Cesar O., Puente-Montejano, Cesar A., Ontiveros-Zepeda, Arturo S., García-Alcaraz, Jorge L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 01.08.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: CAD; CAE) and Design; Computer aided design; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD; Coordinate measuring machines; Engineering; Fused deposition modeling; Genetic algorithms; Industrial and Production Engineering; Lead time; Mechanical Engineering; Media Management; Original Article; Surface layers; Three dimensional printing; Path optimization; Fused filament fabrication; Genetic algorithm; Dimensional precision
• ISSN: 0268-3768; 1433-3015
• DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07314-w

Additive manufacturing (AM) has managed to stand out globally, with a financial forecast growth of $26.28 billion by 2027, where $14.54 billion will be generated due to fused filament fabrication (FFF) technology. Despite this significant growth, researchers in the FFF field are working on solving problems associated with productivity and efficiency, where finishing components are one of the most critical aspects. This paper reports the implementation of a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the extruder path during the FFF process, comparing the results based on the dimensional finish of a printed component with the traditional method (C TRAD ) with a printed component with the implementation of a GA that modifies the 3D printing path (C MOD ). The methodology includes (1) FFF of the C TRAD and FFF of the C MOD and (2) measuring and comparing 118 dimensions associated with each attribute of C TRAD and C MOD using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Comparisons are made among the computer-aided design (CAD), the C TRAD , and the C MOD . Results show that 83.9% of the dimensions of the C TRAD components are different from the dimensions of the components defined in the CAD, and 81% of the dimensions of the C MOD components are different from the dimensions of the components defined in the CAD. Finally, 53% of the dimensions in the C TRAD are different from those in the C MOD . The implementation of the GA helps reduce the lead time of the subject of study by 11.2%, ensuring that the surface texture of C TRAD and C MOD has the same behavior and is greater than those defined in CAD design. Also, it is identified that there is no significant dimensional difference between the C TRAD and the C MOD .