Smells in system user interactive tests

• Published in: Empirical software engineering : an international journal Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 20
• Main Authors: Rwemalika, Renaud, Habchi, Sarra, Papadakis, Mike, Le Traon, Yves, Brasseur, Marie-Claude
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.01.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Compilers; Computer Science; Empirical analysis; Graphical user interface; Interactive systems; Interpreters; Literature reviews; Programming Languages; Smell; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems; Software testing; Test smells; Multivocal literature review; Refactoring; System user interface tests; GUI tests
• ISSN: 1382-3256; 1573-7616
• DOI: 10.1007/s10664-022-10251-1

Test smells are known as bad development practices that reflect poor design and implementation choices in software tests. Over the last decade, there are few attempts to study test smells in the context of system tests that interact with the System Under Test through a Graphical User Interface. To fill the gap, we conduct an exploratory analysis of test smells occurring in System User Interactive Tests (SUIT). We thus, compose a catalog of 35 SUIT-specific smells, identified through a multi-vocal literature review, and show how they differ from smells encountered in unit tests. We also conduct an empirical analysis to assess the diffuseness and removal of these smells in 48 industrial repositories and 12 open-source projects. Our results show that the same type of smells tends to appear in both industrial and open-source projects, but they are not addressed in the same way. We also find that smells originating from a combination of multiple code locations appear more often than those that are localized on a single line. This happens because of the difficulty to observe non-local smells without tool support. Furthermore, we find that smell-removing actions are not frequent with less than 50% of the affected tests ever undergoing a smell removal. Interestingly, while smell-removing actions are rare, some smells disappear while discarding tests, i.e., these smells do not appear in follow-up tests that replace the discarded ones.