Effect of Mn Substitution on Microstructure Evolution and Magnetic Phase Transition in La(Fe1−xMnx)10.8Co0.7Si1.5 Compounds

The influences of Mn substitution for Fe on microstructures of La(Fe 1− x Mn x ) 10.8 Co 0.7 Si 1.5 ( x  = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03) alloys in both the as-cast state and the annealed state have been studied. The results show that Mn substitution promotes the fining of the as-cast microstructure and incre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetallurgical and materials transactions. A, Physical metallurgy and materials science Vol. 44; no. 13; pp. 5782 - 5787
Main Authors Sun, Song, Ye, Rongchang, Li, Huaifeng, Zhang, Yanpo, Jia, Yuanhang, Wu, Yunfei, Long, Yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.12.2013
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The influences of Mn substitution for Fe on microstructures of La(Fe 1− x Mn x ) 10.8 Co 0.7 Si 1.5 ( x  = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03) alloys in both the as-cast state and the annealed state have been studied. The results show that Mn substitution promotes the fining of the as-cast microstructure and increases the formation of 1:13 phase significantly when annealed. An almost single 1:13 phase is obtained for x  = 0.01 when annealed at 1373 K (1100 °C) for 3 days, while a large amount of impurity phases is still present for x  = 0. By increasing the amount of Mn to x  = 0.02, a more purified annealed microstructure can be obtained. However, further substitution of Mn up to x  = 0.03 is harmful for the formation of 1:13 phase. The Curie temperature T C of the annealed La(Fe 1− x Mn x ) 10.8 Co 0.7 Si 1.5 ( x  = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03) varies monotonously with Mn content x , decreasing from ~279 K (6 °C) for x  = 0 to ~236 K (−37 °C) for x  = 0.03. When x  = 0.01, a higher maximum entropy change (−Δ S ) max of 5.3 J/(kgK) and relative cooling power (RCP) of 166 J/kg can be obtained under a magnetic field of 2T. Further substitution of Mn ( x  = 0.02) results in a slight decrease of (−Δ S ) max , whereas a larger RCP can still be kept.
ISSN:1073-5623
1543-1940
DOI:10.1007/s11661-013-1925-2