Technology and Innovation Management Indicators and Assessment Based on Government Performance

• Published in: Management (Belgrade University, Faculty of Organizational Sciences) Vol. 21; no. 78; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Marinkovic, Sanja, Rakicevic, Jovana, Levi Jaksic, Maja
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Belgrade University of Belgrade, Faculty of organizational sciences 01.05.2016; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organisational Sciences
• Subjects: Economic theory; Entrepreneurship; Innovations; Management; Public administration; Sustainability; Serbia; Slovenia; Croatia
• ISSN: 1820-0222; 2406-0658
• DOI: 10.7595/management.fon.2016.0001

Throughout large global databases, such as OECD, UNDP, ITU, Eurostat, World Bank, and Statistical offices of countries, there are many indicators that refer to Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) performance of countries. However, a question arises of how to classify and systematically analyze these indicators in terms of measuring, monitoring and enhancing TIM performance at a national level. More specifically, in this paper we pose a question of how to assess the government performance in TIM, as one aspect of the Triple Helix model. Therefore, we use a model of thirty-nine indicators which are classified according to three main management functions: planning, organizing and control, observed as input, process and output, respectively. More importantly, we analyze the relations that exist between these three categories of indicators. Planning indicators are observed as the investments in technological and innovative activities; organizing indicators include the infrastructure, public administration efficiency and cooperation support, while control indicators refer to the national economy R&D, transfer effects and entrepreneurship outcomes. The model is tested for assessing and comparing government performance in TIM for three countries: Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia, for the time period 2007-2012. Finally, as a feedback in the model, we used scores of the countries according to the Global Innovation Index and the Global Competitiveness Index, to verify the results and provide the final conclusion.