Harvest residue recycling rather than slash-burning results in the enhancement of soil fertility and bacterial community stability in Eucalyptus plantations

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 945; p. 173850
• Main Authors: Wang, Zhengye, Zhao, Ziqi, Wang, Huili, Wu, Qinzhan, Ke, Qin, Zhu, Lingyue, Wu, Lichao, Chen, Lijun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.10.2024
• Subjects: Community assembly; Microbial community composition; Microbial ecological restoration; Slash burnt vs. unburnt; Soil fertility; Microbial ecological restoration; Slash burnt vs. unburnt; Community assembly; Soil fertility; Microbial community composition
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173850

Deforestation and slash combustion have substantial adverse impacts on the atmosphere, soil and microbe. Despite this awareness, numerous individuals persist in opting for high-intensity Eucalyptus planting through slash-burning in pursuit of immediate profits while disregarding the environmental significance and destroying the soil. Slash-unburnt agriculture can effectively safeguard the ecological environment, and compared with slash-burning, there remains a limited understanding of its regulatory mechanisms on soil fertility and microbial community. Also, large uncertainty persists regarding the utilization of harvest residues. Thoroughly investigating these questions from various perspectives encompassing physical soil characteristics, nutrient availability, bacterial community structures, and stability is crucial. To explore the ecological advantages of slash-unburnt techniques on microorganisms and their associated ecosystems, we used two slash-unburnt (Unburnt) planting techniques: Spread (naturally and evenly covering the forest floor after logging) and Stack (residues are piled along contour lines) as well as the traditional slash Burnt method (Burnt) in a Eucalyptus plantation. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two methods. We observed that over a span of 4 years, despite the initial lower application of fertilizer in the Unburnt treatments compared with the Burnt treatment during the first 2 years, the Unburnt treatment gradually caught up or even surpassed and attained similar nutrient levels as the Burnt treatment. Alphaproteobacteria was the main phyla that indicated the difference in soil bacterial communities between Burnt and Unburnt treatments. The microbial networks also highlighted the significance of the Unburnt method, as it contributed to the preservation of crucial network nodes and the stability of soil bacterial communities. Therefore, rational utilization of harvest residue may effectively avoid the vast damage caused by slash-burning to Eucalyptus trees and the soil environment but may also increase the potential for restoring soil fertility, improving fertilizer utilization efficiency, and maintaining microbial community stability over time. [Display omitted] •Unburning methods can significantly mitigate the prolonged reliance on chemical fertilizer.•Slash burning have the potential to disturb the physical integrity of the soil.•Slash unburning enhances soil bacteria connection, reducing available nutrient loss more effectively.•Alphaproteobacteria may be key in differentiating soil bacterial communities between treatments.•Slash unburning helps protect key nodes of bacterial networks and the stability of soil bacterial communities.