A Simulation Sandbox to Compare Fixed-Route, Semi-flexible Transit, and On-demand Microtransit System Designs

With advances in emerging technologies, options for operating public transit services have broadened from conventional fixed-route service through semi-flexible service to on-demand microtransit. Nevertheless, guidelines for deciding between these services remain limited in the real implementation....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKSCE journal of civil engineering Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 3043 - 3062
Main Authors Yoon, Gyugeun, Chow, Joseph Y. J., Rath, Srushti
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul Korean Society of Civil Engineers 01.07.2022
Springer Nature B.V
대한토목학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:With advances in emerging technologies, options for operating public transit services have broadened from conventional fixed-route service through semi-flexible service to on-demand microtransit. Nevertheless, guidelines for deciding between these services remain limited in the real implementation. An open-source simulation sandbox is developed that can compare state-of-the-practice methods for evaluating between the different types of public transit operations. For the case of the semi-flexible service, the Mobility Allowance Shuttle Transit (MAST) system is extended to include passenger deviations. A case study demonstrates the sandbox to evaluate and existing B63 bus route in Brooklyn, NY and compares its performance with the four other system designs spanning across the three service types for three different demand scenarios.
ISSN:1226-7988
1976-3808
DOI:10.1007/s12205-022-0995-3