Maternal Employment, Race, and Work Orientation of High School Girls

Socialization by mothers, a key determinant of daughters' work orientation, has generally been thought to operate via positive role-modeling. But socialization also occurs through negative modeling, normative influence, and conditional modeling. Using a sample of Louisville high school senior g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial forces Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. 187 - 204
Main Authors Macke, Anne Statham, Morgan, William R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The University of North Carolina Press 01.09.1978
University of North Carolina Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Socialization by mothers, a key determinant of daughters' work orientation, has generally been thought to operate via positive role-modeling. But socialization also occurs through negative modeling, normative influence, and conditional modeling. Using a sample of Louisville high school senior girls and their mothers, we tested whether the differential presence of these processes helps to explain why higher percentages of black than white women work. Other than negative modeling for black girls whose mothers hold blue-collar jobs, both groups of girls have strong similarities, with conditional positive modeling predominating. To the extent that these racial patterns can be generalized, they predict that expanded economic opportunities for black families will reduce racial differences in rates at which mothers are employed. These and other findings suggest that at least for the near future, current family roles, in which breadwinning is primarily the husband's responsibility, are not likely to be radically altered by married women's increasing propensity to work.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-06W2R4CX-Z
istex:91582CE2287C1020A5B3C8BCFAF28CD4B9624A1F
The order of names is alphabetical. The study was funded by the Institute of Social Research at Indiana University, and by Public Health Service grants (MH24616-01; RR7031). We thank Robert Myers, Louisville Public Schools, for cooperation in the data collection; Lois Downey for computational assistance; and Carolyn Mullins for editorial suggestions. Peter Burke, Elton Jackson, and the anonymous reviewers made helpful comments on an earlier draft.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI:10.1093/sf/57.1.187