A 4-Phase DAB Current-Mode Hysteretic Controlled Buck Converter With Relaxed Inductor Requirements and Enhanced DC and Dynamic Performance

This article presents a four-phase current-mode hysteretic-controlled DC-DC buck converter with fixed-frequency double-adaptive-bound (DAB) control. In prior current-mode converter designs, there exists undesired output DC error caused by control loop delays and mismatches between the RC current sen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE journal of solid-state circuits Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 1556 - 1566
Main Authors Zhao, Lei, Tang, Junyao, Wei, Kang, Huang, Cheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.05.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article presents a four-phase current-mode hysteretic-controlled DC-DC buck converter with fixed-frequency double-adaptive-bound (DAB) control. In prior current-mode converter designs, there exists undesired output DC error caused by control loop delays and mismatches between the RC current sensing network and the DC resistance (DCR) of the power inductor. Circuit delay is also an obstacle in achieving higher switching frequency and multi-phase operation. To address these issues, ratioed sensing RC network and digital output DC calibration are proposed. To reduce the efficiency degradation caused by imbalanced phase current, digital current balancing (CB) calibration is also developed. To maintain a high efficiency with a wide output load range, digital active-phase-count (APC) function was also introduced, with burst mode (BM) to improve transient responses at fast load current steps. The proposed converter has been fabricated in 180-nm CMOS process and measured at 10 and 25 MHz with 18-to-100-nH miniature 0402 inductors, converting 1.8-V supply (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">\text{V}_{\mathrm{ IN}} </tex-math></inline-formula>) to 0.6-1.5-V output with 93.9% peak efficiency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0018-9200
1558-173X
DOI:10.1109/JSSC.2023.3318175