Assessment Capacity Building at a Research University

Higher education institutions use program‐level learning outcomes assessment to improve programs, enhance student learning, and meet external requirements. An assessment office at a research university used a variety of evaluation capacity‐building (ECB) activities to increase faculty and administra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNew directions for evaluation Vol. 2016; no. 151; pp. 69 - 83
Main Author Stitt-Bergh, Monica
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Fairhaven Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Higher education institutions use program‐level learning outcomes assessment to improve programs, enhance student learning, and meet external requirements. An assessment office at a research university used a variety of evaluation capacity‐building (ECB) activities to increase faculty and administrators’ engagement in assessment and use of findings for program improvement. To investigate six desired ECB outcomes, the author analyzed survey responses and program assessment reports (2008–2014). The findings showed success in four ECB outcomes: positive attitudes toward assessment, motivation to engage, knowledge and skills, and department climate. However, two outcomes fell below expectations: department resources and use of findings. A correlation study revealed several significant, positive relationships between outcomes and faculty engagement with the strongest relationship being between level of faculty assessment experience and knowledge and skills. Because use of findings for program improvement and better student learning are primary assessment purposes, these results are valuable for campus planning of future capacity‐building activities. New ECB efforts that focus on faculty capacity to discuss assessment with colleagues, department resources, and most important, ways to use assessment findings are planned.
Bibliography:ArticleID:EV20196
istex:D1A39C8A848EAE0A7C82C7FFA395B160FC563B04
ark:/67375/WNG-RZHRP4R7-0
ISSN:1097-6736
1534-875X
DOI:10.1002/ev.20196