Polyacrylamide gel migration after injection for breast augmentation: A case report

Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) was once considered a safe, reliable, and compatible injected filler and was widely used in breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, and other cosmetic surgeries. However, numerous complications, such as implant migration, have been observed after PAAG injections. Herein, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery Vol. 4; no. 1; pp. 20 - 24
Main Authors Yan, Rongshuai, Lan, Yujie, Lei, Zeyuan, Chen, Yao, Fan, Dongli, Zhang, Yiming, Wang, Shaoliang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.03.2022
Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery,Xinqiao Hospital,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400037,China
KeAi Communications Co. Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) was once considered a safe, reliable, and compatible injected filler and was widely used in breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, and other cosmetic surgeries. However, numerous complications, such as implant migration, have been observed after PAAG injections. Herein, we report a rare case of distant implant migration after PAAG injection for breast augmentation in which the material became displaced along the abdominal wall to the perineum and pelvic extraperitoneal space. After a well-prepared preoperative evaluation involving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) examinations and three-dimensional hologram, debridement surgery was performed to remove the injected material. After the operation, the patient was followed up for two years and was not scheduled for a second operation. Postoperative complications of breast augmentation after PAAG injection, especially gel migration, still affect thousands of patients. Once material migration occurs, surgical removal becomes difficult. Early diagnosis and treatment are recommended.
ISSN:2096-6911
2096-6911
DOI:10.1016/j.cjprs.2022.02.001