Real-Time Estimation of Vertical Instability Growth Rate for EAST Plasma With MLP

Vertical instability (VI) is one of the main challenges for fusion energy realization through advanced tokamak. The disruption caused by VI is known as vertical displacement event (VDE). VDE not only causes serious thermal load to the plasma-facing components but also generates huge mechanical load...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on plasma science Vol. 51; no. 10; pp. 3243 - 3249
Main Authors Liu, B. N., Hu, W. H., Huang, Y., Luo, Z. P., Wang, Y. H., Yuan, Q. P., Zhang, R. R., Xiao, B. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.10.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Vertical instability (VI) is one of the main challenges for fusion energy realization through advanced tokamak. The disruption caused by VI is known as vertical displacement event (VDE). VDE not only causes serious thermal load to the plasma-facing components but also generates huge mechanical load to the first wall. VI growth rate is a crucial parameter not only for VI identification but also for active control of vertical displacement. In this work, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model is employed to estimate the plasma VI growth rate (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">\gamma </tex-math></inline-formula>) of the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST). This model shows great advantages in calculation speed compared with the conventional way of solving rigid plasma response model equations. In this model, 38 magnetic probe measurements divided by plasma current (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">I_{p} </tex-math></inline-formula>) for normalization are taken as input features. Meanwhile, the neural network was trained by taking plasma equilibrium parameters as input features for comparison. The results demonstrate a slightly lower prediction accuracy than the original model. The mean absolute error (MAE) increased from 1.02 to 1.68 <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">\text{s}^{-1} </tex-math></inline-formula>, and the mean square error (MSE) increased from 1.89 to 10.03 <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">\text{s}^{-2} </tex-math></inline-formula>. Finally, issues related to the interpretability of neural networks are discussed.
ISSN:0093-3813
1939-9375
DOI:10.1109/TPS.2023.3321377