Twitter Gone Wrong: How Constructive Dialog and Collaboration Enable Innovation

We use the recent example of NumPy, an open source numerical library, to explore encouraging open constructive dialog as foundational for innovation. We describe the various social forces that explain how it is possible for an article with 26 authors in 2020 to be published with no women coauthors....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputing in science & engineering Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 97 - 101
Main Authors Frehill, Lisa M., Leung, Mary Ann
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.01.2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We use the recent example of NumPy, an open source numerical library, to explore encouraging open constructive dialog as foundational for innovation. We describe the various social forces that explain how it is possible for an article with 26 authors in 2020 to be published with no women coauthors. While we use this article to illustrate various points, it is important to state that we do not vilify individuals or cast blame; by definition, social forces are forces outside ourselves. However, we can overcome challenges associated with social forces, so we conclude by discussing the importance of relative numbers and how teams might engage in more proactive strategies to enhance their inclusion of diverse voices in the innovation process and, as a bonus, to avoid Twitter storms.
ISSN:1521-9615
1558-366X
DOI:10.1109/MCSE.2020.3043153