Innovate – Don’t Imitate! -ENCJ Research Should Focus on Research Gaps

After a critical evaluation of the proposal by van Dijk and Vos to make judicial independence and accountability measurable, this paper discusses a number of basic methodological decisions that need to be made before meaningful indicators can be constructed. The paper then moves on to deplore the la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal for court administration Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 47 - 53
Main Author Voigt, Stefan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Association for Court Administration 19.12.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:After a critical evaluation of the proposal by van Dijk and Vos to make judicial independence and accountability measurable, this paper discusses a number of basic methodological decisions that need to be made before meaningful indicators can be constructed. The paper then moves on to deplore the lack of knowledge regarding the effects of judicial councils and proposes that more research be carried out to reduce our knowledge deficit. It further describes the rising importance of prosecutors and the complete lack of indicators regarding prosecutorial accountability. It argues that producing indicators with regard to prosecutors could add a lot more value than yet another indicator on judicial independence.
ISSN:2156-7964
2156-7964
DOI:10.18352/ijca.279