Precision Versus Practicality: A Comprehensive Analysis of Robotic Right Colectomy Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy, Future Directions, Biases, Research Gaps, and Their Implications

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 16; no. 1; p. e52904
• Main Authors: Kossenas, Konstantinos, Karamatzanis, Ioannis, Moutzouri, Olga, Catalli, Beatrice, Biris, Andreas I, Dimaki, Dimitra, Kokkofiti, Ifigeneia, Georgopoulos, Filippos
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Cureus Inc 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Clinical trials; Colorectal cancer; Hospital costs; Hospitalization; Laparoscopy; Lymphatic system; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Patients; Robotic surgery; Surgical anastomosis; Surgical outcomes; Surgical techniques; Systematic review; United States > US; colectomy; colorectal cancer; surgical outcomes; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52904

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world and second in cancer-related mortality. It is most prevalent in the developed world and is often associated with lifestyle factors along with age and genetics. The inclusion criteria comprised high-level evidence, such as randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, conducted between 2012 and 2023, that directly compared the two approaches. The review reveals mixed outcomes between robotic right colectomy (RRC) and laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC). The robotic approach was associated with longer operative duration and higher costs but with decreased blood loss and quicker recovery compared to laparoscopy. On the other hand, no major differences were observed regarding lymph node retrieval, duration of hospitalization, and surgical complications. Regarding future directions, it is evident that the focus needs to shift beyond the operative parameters and to patient-centered outcomes, which are underreported. Also, more randomized clinical trials are required, focusing on safety, efficacy, and long-term quality of life. Costs-benefit analyses are required to weigh the benefits of robotic surgery against the implementation and practice costs. Additionally, improvements in surgeons' training may be necessary to reduce the operative duration and potentially decrease operational costs. Finally, standardization of research protocols may be necessary to reduce biases.