Assessment of Durum Wheat Cultivars’ Adaptability to Mediterranean Environments Using G × E Interaction Analysis

• Published in: Agronomy (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 102
• Main Authors: Ninou, Elissavet, Tsivelika, Nektaria, Sistanis, Iosif, Katsenios, Nikolaos, Korpetis, Evangelos, Vazaneli, Eirini, Papathanasiou, Fokion, Didos, Spiros, Argiriou, Anagnostis, Mylonas, Ioannis
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Adaptability; Agricultural commodities; Agricultural production; Agriculture; Air temperature; Analysis; Biomass; Climate change; Climatic changes; Crop yield; Crop yields; crossover rank; Cultivars; Farming; Farming systems; general adaptability; Genetic aspects; Genotype & phenotype; Genotypes; GGE biplot; Irrigation; Mediterranean environments; multi-environment agronomic evaluation; Pasta; Plant breeding; Planting; Productivity; Soil moisture; Soil moisture deficiency; Soil temperature; stability of production; Subgroups; Triticum durum; Wheat; Wheat industry; Greece; Mexico
• ISSN: 2073-4395; 2073-4395
• DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14010102

Aside from plant breeding and agricultural inputs, understanding and interpreting the Genotype × Environment (G × E) interaction has contributed significantly to the increase in wheat yield. In Central Macedonia, Greece, fifteen commercially important durum wheat cultivars and one landrace were tested in six cultivation environments classified into high- and low- productivity environments. This study aimed to identify the most productive and stable durum wheat genotypes across Mediterranean farming systems through a comparative examination of genotype plus genotype by environment (GGE) biplot alongside fifteen parametric and non-parametric stability models. In the organic (low productivity) environment, cultivar Zoi and the landrace Lemnos showed remarkable results, indicating a potential solution for biological agriculture. For the late-sowing (low productivity) environment, some widespread varieties such as Mexicali-81, Meridiano, and Maestrale had excellent performance, showing potential to overcome more adverse conditions during critical grain filling periods such as higher air temperature and deficient soil moisture, i.e., conditions that correlate with climate change. Evaluation of genotypes in all environments for a combination of high yield and stable production, showed that the best genotypes were G8 (Simeto), G2 (Canavaro), and G12 (Elpida). In the subgroup with the three high-productivity environments, G12 (Elpida), G8 (Simeto), and G6 (Mexicali-81) were the best genotypes, followed by G2 (Canavaro), while in the low-productivity subgroup, the G2 (Canavaro), G13 (Zoi) and G8 (Simeto) genotypes were the best.