MODELLING EVACUATION STRATEGIES UNDER DYNAMIC CONDITIONS DUE TO OBSTACLE LOCATIONS BASED ON A SEMANTIC 3D BUILDING MODELS

The evacuation path from inside a building to safe point outside becomes highly unpredictable due to changes in the local geometry or presence of obstacles during a disaster like a fire. During emergencies, Evacuees need appropriate information and hence prediction of an unobstructed path, as it eme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Vol. XLVIII-1/W2-2023; pp. 671 - 677
Main Author Rajan, K. S.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Gottingen Copernicus GmbH 01.01.2023
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The evacuation path from inside a building to safe point outside becomes highly unpredictable due to changes in the local geometry or presence of obstacles during a disaster like a fire. During emergencies, Evacuees need appropriate information and hence prediction of an unobstructed path, as it emerges, needs to be computed well. Understanding the exits with its allowable people flow rate; the type - door or alternative exit such as windows, balconies, etc.; and its role as a node in the graph network is important to ensure safe and timely evacuation from a building. The study here evaluates how obstacles present in the evacuation route affect the removal of the last person. These obstacles, such as furniture, decrease the flow rate at which evacuees can escape. A subspace model is proposed for geometric spaces or carpet areas containing obstacles and is used to compute the shortest obstacle-free paths. The occupancy is considered within the subspaces containing obstacles. The proposed method clearly shows that a graph-based path generation using a subspace model improves the computation time, can be dynamically adapted, and can be scalable across geometric spaces. The results clearly show the impact of the obstacles, with a 2× to 6× rise when compared to obstacle-free scenarios.
ISSN:2194-9034
1682-1750
2194-9034
DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-671-2023