Precision dispersive approaches versus unitarized chiral perturbation theory for the lightest scalar resonances $$\sigma /f_0(500) $$ and $$\kappa /K_0^(700)

For several decades, the $\sigma /f_0(500) $ and $\kappa /K_0^*(700) $ resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review, we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus uni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European physical journal. ST, Special topics Vol. 230; no. 6; pp. 1539 - 1574
Main Authors Peláez, José R., Rodas, Arkaitz, Ruiz de Elvira, Jacobo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Springer 16.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For several decades, the $\sigma /f_0(500) $ and $\kappa /K_0^*(700) $ resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review, we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory, when applied to the lightest scalar mesons $\sigma /f_0(500) $ and $\kappa /K_0^*(700) $. Here, the former have settled the long-standing controversy about the existence of these states, providing a precise determination of their parameters, whereas unitarization of chiral effective theories allows us to understand their nature, spectroscopic classification and dependence on QCD parameters. Here we review in a pedagogical way their uses, advantages and caveats.
Bibliography:AC05-06OR23177; PID2019-106080GB-C21; SC0018416
Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
JLAB-THY-21-3306; DOE/OR/23177-5116; arXiv:2101.06506
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)
ISSN:1951-6355
1951-6401
DOI:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00142-9