Unsupervised outlier detection in heavy-ion collisions

Abstract We present different methods of unsupervised learning which can be used for outlier detection in high energy nuclear collisions. This method is of particular interest for heavy ion collisions where a direct comparison of experimental data to model simulations is often ambiguous and it is no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysica scripta Vol. 96; no. 6; p. 64003
Main Authors Thaprasop, P, Zhou, K, Steinheimer, J, Herold, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.06.2021
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract We present different methods of unsupervised learning which can be used for outlier detection in high energy nuclear collisions. This method is of particular interest for heavy ion collisions where a direct comparison of experimental data to model simulations is often ambiguous and it is not easy to determine whether an observation is due to new physics, an incomplete understanding of the known physics or an experimental artefact. The UrQMD model is used to generate the bulk background of events as well as different variants of outlier events which may result from misidentified centrality or detector malfunctions. The methods presented here can be generalized to different and novel physics effects. To detect the outliers, dimensional reduction algorithms are implemented, speciftically the Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Autoencoders (AEN). We find that mainly the reconstruction error is a good measure to distinguish outliers from background. The performance of the algorithms is compared using a ROC curve. It is shown that the number of reduced (encoded) dimensions to describe a single event contributes significantly to the performance of the outlier detection task. We find that the model which is best suited to separate outlier events requires a good performance in reconstructing events and at the same time a small number of parameters.
ISSN:0031-8949
1402-4896
DOI:10.1088/1402-4896/abf214