ARFID Parent Training Protocol (“ARFID‐PTP”): Results of a Randomized Pilot Trial Evaluating a Brief, Parent‐Training Program for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder
ABSTRACT Objective Accessible treatment options for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in children are limited. The current study sought to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a brief, virtual intervention for ARFID in children (“ARFID‐PTP”). Method Families...
Saved in:
Published in | The International journal of eating disorders Vol. 57; no. 11; pp. 2306 - 2317 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.11.2024
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Objective
Accessible treatment options for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in children are limited. The current study sought to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a brief, virtual intervention for ARFID in children (“ARFID‐PTP”).
Method
Families of children ages 5–12 with ARFID (n = 30) were randomized to immediate or waitlist treatment groups, with both groups ultimately receiving ARFID‐PTP. ARFID‐PTP consists of two, 2‐h individual treatment sessions with an optional booster session at 4‐week follow‐up. Families completed acceptability and feasibility measures at end‐of‐treatment, as well as preliminary efficacy measures at 4‐week, 3‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up.
Results
Of 30 families who completed an intake session, 27 (90%) completed treatment. Families rated acceptability as high (M
CEQ‐C = 7.75). Treatment was feasible by participant retention. Exposure adherence was lower than expected, and booster session requests were higher than expected, indicating that achieving feasibility across measures may require treatment modifications. Regarding preliminary efficacy, children in the immediate treatment group had a decrease in ARFID symptoms compared to those on the waitlist. Overall, at 6‐month follow‐up linear mixed models showed participants had significantly reduced ARFID symptoms by presentation (p < 0.05) and in follow‐up completers, children incorporated eight new foods on average.
Discussion
ARFID‐PTP is acceptable and preliminarily efficacious. The protocol may benefit from modifications to increase feasibility; however, booster session content and treatment outcomes suggest a priori feasibility markers may not accurately capture the utility of ARFID‐PTP. Further work should continue to examine the efficacy ARFID‐PTP, particularly in diverse samples where treatment accessibility is urgently needed.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04913194 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding This research is supported by the Benevolent Grant at the University at Albany, SUNY awarded to author C.E.B. This work was supported by grant T32MH096679 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The National Institutes of Mental Health had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0276-3478 1098-108X 1098-108X |
DOI: | 10.1002/eat.24269 |