The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma depends on response to neoadjuvant therapy

Background The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains unclear in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods The 2019 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non‐metastatic PDAC who received NAT followed by pancreaticoduode...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of surgical oncology Vol. 130; no. 1; pp. 109 - 116
Main Authors Carpenter, Elizabeth L., Van Decar, Spencer G., McCarthy, Patrick M., Valdera, Franklin A., Adams, Alexandra M., O'Shea, Anne E., Smolinsky, Todd, Thomas, Katryna, Clifton, Guy T., Newhook, Timothy E., Peoples, George E., Nelson, Daniel W., Vreeland, Timothy J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains unclear in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods The 2019 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non‐metastatic PDAC who received NAT followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy. Only patients with data regarding receipt of AT were included. Patients were classified if they had nodal down‐staging specifically, or any downstaging (Tumor, Nodal, or overall). Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for pretreatment covariate imbalance between groups. The weighted Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test were used to estimate the cumulative survival. Results After exclusion criteria and PSM, a total of 2784 patients remained; 1689 (60.7%) received AT and 1095 (39.3%) did not receive AT. Among all, those with additional AT had a significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). Upon evaluation of patients without downstaging after NAT, those who received AT had improved OS (no nodal downstaging or any downstaging; p = 0.002; p = 0.001). When evaluating patients with downstaging after NAT, those receiving AT did not have improved OS (nodal downstaging or any downstaging: p = 0.352; p = 0.99). Conclusion Response to NAT appears to correlate with the benefit of AT following pancreaticoduodenectomy; patients who have a favorable response to NAT may not benefit from AT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.27689