Who is being targeted by alcohol social media marketing? A study of Chinese young adults in Hong Kong

• Published in: Drug and alcohol review Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 1435 - 1444
• Main Authors: Chan, Rufina H. W., Dong, Dong, Yu, Jiazhou, Kim, Jean H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.09.2024; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Alcohol; Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology; Alcohol Drinking - ethnology; Alcohol Drinking - psychology; Alcohol use; Alcoholic beverage industry; Alcoholic Beverages; attitude; Brands; China; Customers; East Asian People; Female; health behaviour; Hong Kong; Humans; Low income groups; Male; Marketing; Marketing - methods; Social Media; Social networks; Surveys and Questionnaires; Telephone surveys; Uptake; Young Adult; Young adults; Hong Kong; Hong Kong China; China; alcohol; health behaviour; social media; China; attitude
• ISSN: 0959-5236; 1465-3362; 1465-3362
• DOI: 10.1111/dar.13892

Introduction Due to the widespread use of social media by young adults, the alcohol industry has been increasingly using social media marketing (SMM) to target potential customers. This study examines the prevalence and factors associated with past‐month exposure to alcohol SMM among young Chinese adults, a group with rapidly increasing uptake of alcohol consumption. Methods An anonymous, random telephone survey was conducted between June and August 2021 on Hong Kong Chinese residents between 18 and 34 years old (n = 675). Results Of respondents, 52.3% reported past‐month exposure to alcohol SMM (68.6% of past‐month drinkers and 48.0% of non‐past‐month drinkers, p < 0.05) while 71.6% reported exposure to non‐SMM alcohol marketing. Direct alcohol SMM exposure was reported by 40.9% (e.g., business‐to‐consumer postings, alcohol banner ads) while 27.4% of respondents reported exposure to indirect alcohol SMM marketing (e.g., shared/‘liked’ alcohol brand posts). Of those exposed to alcohol SMM, 13.7–15.5% reported that the various forms indirect alcohol SMM influenced them to drink more (vs. 6.2–8.9% for direct alcohol SMM). Being male, lower‐income, university educated and spirits/cocktail drinker were independently associated with exposure to direct alcohol SMM (ORmv 1.71–3.14). Past‐month exposure to indirect alcohol SMM was independently associated with lower income, not working full‐time and drinking any type of alcohol (ORmv 1.59–4.44). Discussion and Conclusion The comparative effectiveness of indirect SMM on influencing young adults drinking intentions may be a form of peer endorsement of drinking. The pervasiveness of alcohol SMM and lack of alcohol SMM policies may indicate the need for greater alcohol marketing regulation in this region.