Nitrogen-phosphorus doped starch carbon enhanced biohydrogen production

To solve the thermodynamic limitations on the hydrogen (H2) yield by dark fermentation (DF), the conductive carbons are usually used to mediate the H2-DF. In this work, the nitrogen (N)-phosphorus (N) doped starch carbon (NPSC) was prepared and characterized to investigate its influence on H2-DF. NP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 47; no. 66; pp. 28372 - 28384
Main Authors Zhou, Chen, Zhang, Huiwen, Zhang, Jishi, Yang, Junwei, Yang, Mengchen, Zang, Lihua, Yang, Qinzheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To solve the thermodynamic limitations on the hydrogen (H2) yield by dark fermentation (DF), the conductive carbons are usually used to mediate the H2-DF. In this work, the nitrogen (N)-phosphorus (N) doped starch carbon (NPSC) was prepared and characterized to investigate its influence on H2-DF. NPSC effectively raise H2 yield compared with starch-derived carbon (SC). The optimal dosage of SC (400 mg/L) and NPSC (600 mg/L) caused the highest H2 yield of 219.5 and 261.2 mL/g glucose, respectively, being higher than the control yield (161.4 mL/g glucose). Factually, compared with the control group without any carbon, NPSC optimized the microbial community structure and increased the abundance of C. butyricum from 19.09% to 30.87%. This fact increased the shift of metabolic pathway to butyric acid evolution, thereby promoting the substrate conversion level to H2. [Display omitted] •Nitrogen and phosphorus doped starch carbon (NPSC) promoted electron transfer.•Optimal dosage of starch-derived carbon (SC) and NPSC were 400 and 600 mg/L.•NPSC enriched Clostridium butyricum more efficient than SC and control groups.•Metabolism analysis revealed NPSC raised the microbial activity in H2 evolution.•The highest H2 yields of SC and NPSC groups were 219.5 and 261.2 mL/g glucose.
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.173