Research Progress on the Solid Electrolyte of Solid-State Sodium-Ion Batteries

Because sodium-ion batteries are relatively inexpensive, they have gained significant traction as large-scale energy storage devices instead of lithium-ion batteries in recent years. However, sodium-ion batteries have a lower energy density than lithium-ion batteries because sodium-ion batteries hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inElectrochemical energy reviews Vol. 7; no. 1
Main Authors Zhao, Shuzhi, Che, Haiying, Chen, Suli, Tao, Haixiang, Liao, Jianping, Liao, Xiao-Zhen, Ma, Zi-Feng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.12.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Because sodium-ion batteries are relatively inexpensive, they have gained significant traction as large-scale energy storage devices instead of lithium-ion batteries in recent years. However, sodium-ion batteries have a lower energy density than lithium-ion batteries because sodium-ion batteries have not been as well developed as lithium-ion batteries. Solid-state batteries using solid electrolytes have a higher energy density than liquid batteries in regard to applications with sodium-ion batteries, making them more suitable for energy storage systems than liquid batteries. Due to their low ionic conductivity, solid electrolytes are currently unable to achieve comparable performance to liquid electrolytes at room temperature. In this review, we discuss the advancements in SSEs applied to sodium-ion batteries in recent years, including inorganic solid electrolytes, such as Na–β-Al 2 O 3 , NASICON and Na 3 PS 4 , polymer solid electrolytes based on PEO, PVDF-HFP and PAN, and plastic crystal solid electrolytes mainly composed of succinonitrile. Additionally, appropriate solutions for low ionic conductivity, a narrow electrochemical stability window and poor contact with electrodes, which are the significant flaws in current SSEs, are discussed in this review. Graphical Abstract
ISSN:2520-8489
2520-8136
DOI:10.1007/s41918-023-00196-4