Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Impact of Different Concentrations of Glyphosate on the Growth of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao)

• Published in: Applied sciences Vol. 14; no. 18; p. 8180
• Main Authors: Valenzuela-Cobos, Juan, Guevara-Viejó, Fabricio, Galindo-Villardón, Purificación, Vicente-Galindo, Purificación
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2024
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Agriculture; Analysis; Chlorophyll; Cocoa; Crop damage; Dimensional analysis; dose-response; Efficiency; GDP; Glyphosate; Gross Domestic Product; Herbicides; phytotoxicity; seedlings; Theobroma cocoa; Weeds; Ecuador; Spain
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app14188180

Ecuadorian cocoa possesses important organoleptic characteristics such as aroma and flavor, called fine and aromatic cocoa. The objective of this study was to evaluate the initial growth responses of young cocoa seedlings to glyphosate in a dose progression in 45 cocoa plants (5 months old), which were transplanted into pots with substrate adjusted to pH 6.0–6.5. Glyphosate doses (0 to 904 g e.e. ha−1) were applied every two weeks, evaluating the impact at 30 and 60 days post-application. Data on shikimate accumulation parameters, chlorophyll content and PSII quantum efficiency were subjected to multivariate analysis using a three-dimensional scatter plot. The results indicated that high concentrations of glyphosate contributed to higher shikimate concentration and lower PSII quantum efficiency. The findings for the variables crop damage, stem height and stem diameter were evaluated by ANOVA. Similarities were reported between the results of the variables height and diameter, and significant differences (p < 0.05) in the variable crop damage for all treatments were also reported. In terms of phytotoxic reaction and growth parameters, the most efficient treatment was DO4, since the seedlings with this dosage showed a low percentage of damage (10%) and the best indices in terms of height and diameter. The least efficient treatment was D15. The control plants (DO1) showed a crop damage of >50% because the absence of control favored weed proliferation. These indications highlight the need to adjust glyphosate doses according to the specific needs of each crop and the development stage of the plant in order to reduce negative effects and maximize potential benefits.