A spinal circuit model with asymmetric cervical-lumbar layout controls backward locomotion and scratching in quadrupeds

• Published in: Neural networks Vol. 178; p. 106422
• Main Authors: Zhu, Qinghua, Han, Fang, Yu, Ying, Wang, Fengjie, Wang, Qingyun, Shakeel, Awais
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2024
• Subjects: Asymmetric cervical-lumbar circuit; Backward locomotion; Computational modeling; Neuronal control; Scratching; Asymmetric cervical-lumbar circuit; Backward locomotion; Neuronal control; Computational modeling; Scratching
• ISSN: 0893-6080; 1879-2782; 1879-2782
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106422

Locomotion and scratching are basic motor functions which are critically important for animal survival. Although the spinal circuits governing forward locomotion have been extensively investigated, the organization of spinal circuits and neural mechanisms regulating backward locomotion and scratching remain unclear. Here, we extend a model by Danner et al. to propose a spinal circuit model with asymmetrical cervical-lumbar layout to investigate these issues. In the model, the left–right alternation within the cervical and lumbar circuits is mediated by V 0D and V 0V commissural interneurons (CINs), respectively. With different control strategies, the model closely reproduces multiple experimental data of quadrupeds in different motor behaviors. Specifically, under the supraspinal drive, walk and trot are expressed in control condition, half-bound is expressed after deletion of V 0V CINs, and bound is expressed after deletion of V0 (V 0D and V 0V) CINs; in addition, unilateral hindlimb scratching occurs in control condition and synchronous bilateral hindlimb scratching appears after deletion of V 0V CINs. Under the combined drive of afferent feedback and perineal stimulation, different coordination patterns between hindlimbs during BBS (backward-biped-spinal) locomotion are generated. The results suggest that (1) the cervical and lumbar circuits in the spinal network are asymmetrically recruited during particular rhythmic limb movements. (2) Multiple motor behaviors share a single spinal network under the reconfiguration of the spinal network by supraspinal inputs or somatosensory feedback. Our model provides new insights into the organization of motor circuits and neural control of rhythmic limb movements.