Effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for managing ADHD symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review sought to provide evidence for the effectiveness of common pharmacological interventions used for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) population, considering studies attempting to find safe and effective drugs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry Vol. 134; p. 111089
Main Authors Martins, Paulo Levi Bezerra, Torquato, Gustavo César Parente, Dias, Gabriel Alberto Pinheiro Fernandes, Leite, Isabel Bessa, Gaspar, Thays Macedo, Pinto, Joel Porfírio, Macedo, Danielle S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Inc 30.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This systematic review sought to provide evidence for the effectiveness of common pharmacological interventions used for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) population, considering studies attempting to find safe and effective drugs. We searched for randomized controlled trials describing the effectiveness and/or safety profile of pharmacological interventions for treating ASD and ADHD or ASD with ADHD symptoms using three bibliographic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. We have chosen ADHD symptoms measured by any clinical scale as the primary outcome. As additional outcomes, we have used other symptoms of aberrant behavior measured by the aberrant behavior checklist, satisfaction with treatment, and peer satisfaction. Twenty-two publications met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and eight for the meta-analysis. In our investigation, we found a few articles using clonidine, modafinil, and bupropion as interventions when compared to methylphenidate (MPH). Our meta-analysis showed that MPH had positive changes compared to placebo in symptoms such as hyperactivity, irritability, or inattention. However, no effect was found in stereotyped symptoms, and our data's quantitative analysis revealed a large effect of MPH-induced adverse effects on the dropout rate. On the other hand, atomoxetine initiation had positive effects when compared to placebo on symptoms of hyperactivity and inattention. We have found no effect of atomoxetine on stereotypes or irritability. Furthermore, atomoxetine did not influence side effects that caused dropouts from studies. Our results indicated that atomoxetine has a modest effect on hyperactivity and inattention symptoms, with a relatively benign profile of side effects. MPH appears to be effective in handling hyperactivity, inattention, and irritability symptoms. However, our results on atomoxetine revealed increased dropouts due to adverse effects when compared to MPH or placebo. Evidence for other substances such as guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, or modafinil is either preliminary or nonexistent. •MPH reduces hyperactivity, irritability, and inattention with higher side effects.•MPH is ineffective for stereotyped behaviors with higher dropout rates.•ATX is effective for hyperactivity and inattention with minimal side effects.•ATX had no significant impact on stereotyped behaviors or irritability.•Poor evidence for guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, or modafinil in ASD with ADHD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-5846
1878-4216
1878-4216
DOI:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111089