Adverse allergic reaction to 131I MIBG

No adverse allergic reactions to iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine ( 131 I MIBG) at a diagnostic dose have been reported in the English literature. This report of a skin eruption in a 35-year-old man after an intravenous injection of 131 I MIBG strongly suggests an adverse allergic reaction, and is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of nuclear medicine Vol. 23; no. 7; pp. 697 - 699
Main Authors Ishibashi, Naoya, Abe, Katsumi, Furuhashi, Satoru, Fukushima, Shoko, Yoshinobu, Takashi, Takahashi, Motoichiro, Matsumoto, Chiyuki, Fukuda, Kyoko, Kobayashi, Takayuki, Mochizuki, Norisuke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Springer Japan 01.09.2009
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:No adverse allergic reactions to iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine ( 131 I MIBG) at a diagnostic dose have been reported in the English literature. This report of a skin eruption in a 35-year-old man after an intravenous injection of 131 I MIBG strongly suggests an adverse allergic reaction, and is the first to address such a side effect of 131 I MIBG at a diagnostic dose. Erythematous maculopapular eruptions, some of which were contiguous, were seen in a symmetric disposition on the patient’s chest walls, elbows, neck and face 18 h after the 131 I MIBG injection. Antiallergic treatment resolved the lesions completely. There were no possible causes of the exanthema other than the 131 I MIBG injection. Urticaria related to the 131 I MIBG injection and caused by type I allergic reaction was suspected, and these findings point to the possible risk of a hitherto unreported allergic skin reaction to 131 I MIBG. We would like to draw the attention of nuclear physicians to this possible drawback of 131 I MIBG.
ISSN:0914-7187
1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-009-0282-0