Remote cataloging productivity: an exploratory study in a national library

• Published in: Library management Vol. 43; no. 6/7; pp. 401 - 414
• Main Authors: Ali, Irhamni, Hong, Lingzi, Chen, Jiangping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 17.10.2022; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Digital literacy; Disease control; Gender; Infrastructure; Librarians; Library cataloging; Library catalogs; Library management; Library materials; National libraries; Pandemics; Productivity; Statistical analysis; User services; Work at home; Indonesia; Remote cataloging productivity; Remote working in libraries; Work from home
• ISSN: 0143-5124; 1758-7921
• DOI: 10.1108/LM-12-2021-0109

PurposeDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to prevent the spread of disease, the National Library of Indonesia Cataloging Department adopted remote working. There is a need to examine the productivity of remote cataloging as this form of cataloging becomes more prevalent.Design/methodology/approachThe study was conducted using a mixed methods approach. The authors analyzed data to assess cataloging librarians' productivity based on system logs. Then, the authors interviewed librarians to understand librarians' perspectives concerning productivity and remote cataloging, and also to seek insights into factors that may affect productivity while working remotely.FindingsThe analysis found higher productivity in terms of quantity of cataloging. Librarians' productivity during remote cataloging is not statistically related to individual factors of age, years of experience, or gender. The in-depth interviews found that other factors may hinder the quality and quantity of the remote cataloging, including the working environment, infrastructure, and lack of policies on remote working.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings were based on a study conducted in the National Library of Indonesia, which may not apply to libraries with different infrastructures or existing policies in remote cataloging. However, the authors identified numerous factors that could be related to remote cataloging productivity. More work needs to be done to identify these factors that impact productivity by conducting further surveys.Practical implicationsThe research provides evidence showing the productivity of cataloging can be higher in remote working mode. The study provides insights for library managers to decide whether to implement remote cataloging and what additional perspectives could be considered for the better implementation of remote cataloging.Originality/valueThe gap in the literature about remote cataloging and productivity has been bridged.