Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 in acral melanoma: A nationwide study

Previous studies demonstrated limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable acral melanoma (AM); it remains unclear how this translates to the adjuvant setting. This study investigates clinical outcomes of acral compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients treated with adjuvant an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cancer Vol. 155; no. 8; pp. 1455 - 1465
Main Authors Bloem, Manja, van Not, Olivier J, Aarts, Maureen J B, van den Berkmortel, Franchette W P J, Blank, Christian U, Blokx, Willeke A M, Boers-Sonderen, Marye J, Bonenkamp, Johannes J, de Groot, Jan-Willem B, Haanen, John B, Hospers, Geke A P, Kapiteijn, Ellen W, de Meza, Melissa M, Piersma, Djura, van Rijn, Rozemarijn S, Stevense-den Boer, Marion A M, van der Veldt, Astrid A M, Vreugdenhil, Gerard, van den Eertwegh, Alfons J M, Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P M, Wouters, Michel W J M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 15.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies demonstrated limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable acral melanoma (AM); it remains unclear how this translates to the adjuvant setting. This study investigates clinical outcomes of acral compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection. All stages III-IV AM and CM patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2018 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of RFS was performed to adjust for potential confounders. We included 1958 (86 AM and 1872 CM) patients. At baseline, AM patients more frequently had KIT mutations, higher disease stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and fewer BRAF and NRAS mutations. Median RFS was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5-29.3) in AM and 37.4 months (95% CI: 34.6 to not reached) in CM (p = .002). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.17; p = .019). Two-year DMFS tended to be worse for AM than for CM: 64.5% versus 79.7% (p = .050). Two-year OS was significantly lower in AM (71.5% vs. 84.3%; p = .027). The results of this study suggest a poorer outcome of adjuvant-treated AM compared to CM. Studies assessing the added value of adjuvant treatment in AM are needed. Future research should investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve outcomes of high-risk AM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/ijc.35060